Nick Roadnight

GCC based C-Suite Executive, Non-Executive Director, Independent Advisor and Interim Manager to the Architecture, Design, Consultancy and Construction Industry

The Dual-Role Consultant in Business Divestitures and Acquisitions: Navigating the Complexities

In the intricate dance of corporate divestitures and acquisitions, the involvement of a consultant serving both the seller and the buyer introduces a unique dynamic.

Imagine a scenario where a single consultant is advising a company looking to divest a profitable division with revenues of USD 52 million, an EBITDA of USD 4.8 million, and a workforce of 150, and simultaneously advising a potential acquirer interested in this division. This dual-role consultant navigates the process, balancing the interests and objectives of both parties.

Let’s explore the consultant’s role for each, the potential benefits and challenges, including conflicts of interest, and strategies to mitigate these risks.

Role for the Seller

For the seller, the consultant’s primary objective is to maximize the sale value while ensuring a smooth and efficient transaction process. This involves conducting a comprehensive valuation, preparing detailed informational memoranda, identifying potential buyers, managing the due diligence process, and advising on negotiation strategies.

Role for the Buyer

For the buyer, the consultant aims to ensure the acquisition aligns with strategic growth objectives, conducting thorough due diligence, providing an accurate valuation of the target, devising a financing strategy, and facilitating a seamless post-acquisition integration.

Pros

– Efficiency and Speed: With intimate knowledge of both parties’ needs and objectives, a dual-role consultant can expedite the process, facilitating quicker decision-making and transaction completion.

– Reduced Transaction Costs: Engaging one consultant for both sides can potentially lower the overall costs associated with advisory fees, due diligence, and other transaction-related expenses.

– Enhanced Communication: Acting as a central communication hub, the consultant can efficiently manage information flow between the parties, reducing misunderstandings and aligning expectations.

Cons and Conflicts of Interest

– Conflicts of Interest: The most significant challenge is the inherent conflict of interest. The consultant must balance the seller’s goal of achieving the highest sale price with the buyer’s objective of minimizing acquisition costs.

– Trust Issues: Both parties may have concerns about confidentiality and the impartiality of advice provided by the consultant, potentially impacting the trust essential for a successful transaction.

Overcoming Challenges

– Transparent Communication: Establishing open, transparent communication channels from the outset is crucial. The consultant should clearly outline how information will be shared and ensure that sensitive data is handled with confidentiality.

– Ethical Walls: Implementing ethical walls within the consulting practice can help segregate teams working on behalf of the seller and the buyer, minimizing the risk of confidential information being shared inappropriately.

– Third-party Mediation: In situations where conflicts of interest are particularly challenging to navigate, involving a neutral third party or mediator can provide an additional layer of objectivity and assurance to both sides.

– Full Disclosure and Consent: Perhaps the most critical measure is the full disclosure of the dual role to both parties and obtaining their informed consent before proceeding. This transparency ensures that both the seller and the buyer are aware of the potential for conflicts of interest and agree to the arrangement based on a mutual understanding of the benefits and risks.

Conclusion

The role of a consultant serving both the seller and buyer in a business divestiture and acquisition scenario offers potential efficiencies and cost savings but requires careful navigation of inherent conflicts of interest.

Through transparency, ethical practices, and possibly the involvement of third parties, these challenges can be mitigated, paving the way for a transaction that aligns with the best interests of both parties. Ultimately, the success of such arrangements depends on the consultant’s ability to maintain impartiality, uphold the highest ethical standards, and foster an environment of trust and open communication.